Get the articles sentby email
-
Recent Comments
- Kerry: Any updates/progress?
- Mitchel Desrochers: Heyadministrator I like w/ your article . May i copy this information for my university test ? thanks adminstrator
- matthew fischer: Three months ago I discovered that Oprah and Dr. Oz (Harpo Prod.)have been aggressively using my registered trademark “Live Right Now” without permission to launch Dr. Oz’s new TV show. “Live Right...
- Russell Smith: Thanks Kevin, for the insightful post. I don’t think I need to tell you that I agree! But I did want to tell you that your link to the “article about the filing” is broken. I think you meant to link to...
- monavie: i see your blog this very nice.i like monavie juice
Connect at Facebook
Subscribe the RSS Feed
Connect at LinkedIn
Follow me at Twitter
© 2008 NextGenerationLaw - Home | Archiv | Boring Stuff | Contact | XML Sitemap - Web Design by Affordable Business Websites - PhilippKnoll.com
February 22nd, 2009 at 6:04 pm
Kevin – This is the first I’ve heard of this and it amazes me! They must be hurting pretty badly. I’m completely turned off by their tactics. I am actually a user of mint.com and find their service much better and useful (and CHEAPER) thank MS Money or Quicken. Thanks for your comments. I think you’re spot on. Free advertising for their competitors! HA!
September 18th, 2009 at 9:18 am
Until startups have the fortitude to choose long-term competition over short-term acquisition, industry evolution will be inhibited. The recent sale of Mint is a prime example.