<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BarCamp 2009 Notes #bcn09bloglaw</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nextgenerationlaw.com/barcamp-2009-notes-bcn09bloglaw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nextgenerationlaw.com/barcamp-2009-notes-bcn09bloglaw/</link>
	<description>Ideas for the next generation lawyer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:14:14 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tex</title>
		<link>http://www.nextgenerationlaw.com/barcamp-2009-notes-bcn09bloglaw/comment-page-1/#comment-1225</link>
		<dc:creator>Tex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nextgenerationlaw.com/?p=713#comment-1225</guid>
		<description>Excellent information. I have long agreed bloggers have the right to remain anonymous, if desired. This opinion even includes those I most disagree with, such as ibofb. I would prefer to discuss the issues, not the person. However, I have learned the only way to shut down those more interested in attacking the person is to &quot;return fire.&quot; 

I resent Amway&#039;s request to place real names on their blogs, although they do allow anonymous entries. As the judges state, remaining anonymous is a Constitutional right, which I haven&#039;t seen before. I also agree it promotes more open discussion, except, as described above, when immature people are involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent information. I have long agreed bloggers have the right to remain anonymous, if desired. This opinion even includes those I most disagree with, such as ibofb. I would prefer to discuss the issues, not the person. However, I have learned the only way to shut down those more interested in attacking the person is to &#8220;return fire.&#8221; </p>
<p>I resent Amway&#8217;s request to place real names on their blogs, although they do allow anonymous entries. As the judges state, remaining anonymous is a Constitutional right, which I haven&#8217;t seen before. I also agree it promotes more open discussion, except, as described above, when immature people are involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
